AI CV Improver
Improve CV wording and role alignment while keeping it honest.
Practical AI systems, security tools, productivity utilities, and technical projects designed for real-world use.
Platform Preview
Live DirectionAI CV Improver
Phishing Analyser
Scam Detector
PDF Summariser
312
Security events
47
Tool modules
2,048
Checks today
// featured tools
A focused set of practical utilities designed for everyday work, learning, and trust verification.
Improve CV wording and role alignment while keeping it honest.
Inspect suspicious emails for phishing indicators.
Summarise PDF content into key points.
Draft clearer professional emails from short prompts.
Detect social engineering patterns in messages.
Assess password strength and security hygiene.
// tool categories
Writing, summarisation, meeting and prompt support tools.
Practical security checks for passwords, links, headers, privacy and risk.
Study, writing, citation and planning helpers for academic workflows.
Document and image utilities for conversion, OCR, and cleanup.
Cost comparison and financial utility helpers for better decisions.
Operational AI helpers for proposals, replies, invoices and policy drafts.
Trust and authenticity checks for messages, reviews and sellers.
// about
I am a London-based MSc Cybersecurity & Digital Forensics student originally from Bangladesh, focused on building practical cybersecurity systems and AI security infrastructure. GT is my personal technical identity, and GTRepo is where I document my research projects, experiments, and evolving understanding of modern cybersecurity systems.
My interests center around Zero Trust AI systems, explainable security decisions, digital forensics, threat monitoring, SOC-style platforms, and secure AI gateways. Moving from Bangladesh to London has made the work feel personal: I am building systems while learning, testing ideas through code, and staying curious about future technologies.
Areas of Focus
Designing and implementing Zero Trust principles for AI model serving — every request verified, no implicit trust.
Building security gateways that inspect prompts, evaluate risk, enforce policy, and audit AI model interactions.
Processing memory artefacts, normalising forensic evidence, and building investigation tools using Volatility3.
Developing SOC-style dashboards for anomaly detection, attack-timeline visualisation, and threat correlation.
// research focus
// currently learning
// research philosophy
I am interested in how AI systems, infrastructure, human behavior, and security intersect. I believe future AI systems should be security-first by design: observable, explainable, monitored, and controlled through adaptive trust systems rather than blind access.
My work focuses on building practical systems that combine Zero Trust principles, behavioral analysis, explainable security decisions, forensic visibility, and secure AI infrastructure.
AI systems should be designed with verification, policy, visibility, and control from the beginning.
Security tools become more useful when their decisions can be inspected, explained, and challenged.
Access should respond to behavior, context, risk, and evidence instead of assuming anything is safe.
Good systems leave useful traces for investigation, learning, and future improvement.
// journey
A grounded path from Bangladesh to London, through computer science, postgraduate cybersecurity, and practical AI security experimentation.
// projects
Cybersecurity systems, forensic tools, and SOC infrastructure — all real builds.
MSc Dissertation — Adaptive Zero Trust Architecture for Open-Source AI
AI Security / Zero Trust
An adaptive Zero Trust security architecture for secure onboarding and usage of open-source AI models. Evaluates model posture before deployment, inspects every prompt for adversarial patterns, applies ALLOW / CHALLENGE / BLOCK policy decisions with explainable risk records, filters outputs, and continuously reassesses trust as sessions evolve — feeding a SOC-style monitoring dashboard.
Problem solved
Traditional perimeter-based security cannot address open-source AI risks: data leakage, adversarial manipulation, and misuse of models without a clear control point between user intent, policy enforcement, and audit visibility.
Architecture feel
Five-layer pipeline: model onboarding → Zero Trust enforcement → risk reduction (secure mode) → adaptive reassessment → explainability & SOC audit trail. Backend in FastAPI + PostgreSQL; frontend in Next.js.
Technologies
Experimental
AI Gateway Security
An extension of the Zero Trust AI Gateway that lets external applications route model requests through a security layer before reaching their AI provider. Supports client API key authentication, prompt inspection, policy enforcement, output inspection, structured logging, and drop-in API-style integration.
Problem solved
External apps need a simple way to send AI traffic through security checks without redesigning their full application stack.
Architecture feel
Middleware-style API interceptor with client keys, request inspection, policy enforcement, provider routing, and structured event logging.
Technologies
Prototype / Research Build
Digital Forensics
A digital forensics platform focused on ingesting and analyzing memory artefacts, correlating suspicious activity, and visualizing attack-chain investigations.
Problem solved
Memory evidence can be difficult to inspect quickly when process, network, DLL, command, and timeline signals are spread across raw artefacts.
Technologies
Active UI Module
Security Operations
A SOC-style dashboard for visualising alerts, user anomalies, attack timelines, threat heatmaps, model posture events, and Zero Trust decision logs. Built as a standalone module that integrates with the AI Gateway backend.
Problem solved
Security decisions are hard to trust if they disappear into logs without a readable operational view.
Technologies
Concept / Personal Lab
AI Assistant / Automation
A personal assistant concept focused on local-first automation, voice control, secure tool access, memory persistence, and privacy-aware AI orchestration. Designed to run privately without sending data to third-party services.
Problem solved
Personal assistants need useful automation without ignoring privacy, tool boundaries, local control, and security review.
Technologies
// platform purpose
Most online tools are bloated, low-quality, or overloaded with ads. GTRepo is being built as a modern AI, cybersecurity, and utility ecosystem focused on practical outputs: clear interfaces, trust-aware workflows, and tools that actually solve real problems.
// future ecosystem
Practical AI pipelines that help identify suspicious behavior, risky input, and trust signals faster.
API-first utility modules so other apps can plug into GTRepo checks and AI workflows.
Connected writing, summarisation, and task helpers built for real student and builder workflows.
Automation tools with guardrails, audit visibility, and clear operational controls.
Lightweight trust-check tools in-browser for scam, phishing, and authenticity workflows.
Cross-tool intelligence for verification, efficiency, and long-term platform learning loops.
// msc dissertation
My MSc dissertation explores a practical AI gateway architecture for secure model access. The system applies Zero Trust thinking to AI interactions by inspecting prompts, evaluating contextual risk, enforcing security decisions, inspecting outputs, and producing explainable logs that can support SOC-style monitoring.
A student research system for testing how AI requests can be evaluated, explained, monitored, and controlled before model access is granted.
Dashboard and architecture visuals are kept as prototype previews until the dissertation build is ready to publish more fully.
Improve behavioral scoring, expand threat intelligence signals, strengthen output inspection, and evaluate the gateway against realistic AI security scenarios.
// lab
This lab contains my experimental cybersecurity builds, dissertation prototypes, SOC simulations, and AI security research interfaces. Systems shown here are research builds and student projects — not production deployments.
High-risk prompt detected — policy engine decision: BLOCK
Ambiguous request — escalated to human review queue
Safe request forwarded to model provider — output checked
Injection pattern matched in prompt — request rejected
Audit trace logged — explainability record written to DB
Active experiments
Research prototypes
Deployment/testing notes
Future ideas
// notes from the lab
Personal GT Lab notes on ideas, lessons, and technical reflections as GTRepo evolves.
Traditional Zero Trust focuses on users, devices, and infrastructure, but AI systems introduce new attack surfaces such as prompt injection, unsafe outputs, model misuse, and unrestricted access to powerful models. My current research explores how Zero Trust principles can be adapted into AI gateways that continuously inspect prompts, evaluate trust, monitor behavior, and apply explainable security decisions before and after model execution.
One of the most interesting AI security problems is prompt injection. Unlike traditional exploits, prompt injection manipulates instructions and model behavior rather than software memory directly. I am currently exploring how layered inspection, contextual risk analysis, policy enforcement, and behavioral monitoring can reduce these risks in AI systems.
While building and deploying projects, I realized many deployment issues are not caused by application code itself, but by networking and environment configuration. Understanding container networking, localhost isolation, environment variables, DNS resolution, and service communication became an important part of my learning journey.
I enjoy designing security dashboards because they combine visibility, usability, and technical monitoring into a single interface. My recent work focuses on creating SOC-style dashboards that make threat activity, alerts, system posture, and security decisions easier to observe and understand.
Security systems become more useful when their decisions are understandable. I am particularly interested in explainable security decisions where systems can show why a request was blocked, challenged, or allowed instead of behaving like black boxes.
My current learning path includes understanding how monitoring systems detect suspicious behavior over time. I am exploring how logs, alerts, behavioral patterns, and anomaly tracking can work together to improve visibility in modern security systems.
// beyond technology
Outside cybersecurity, I spend time exploring movies, anime, travelling, technology trends, and long-form curiosity around systems, infrastructure, and future technologies. I enjoy observing how technical systems, people, and ideas evolve together over time.
// stack
The tools powering my cybersecurity builds, forensic systems, and AI security research.
Core Language
Backend Framework
UI Framework
Type-Safe Frontend
Database
Containerisation
ORM & Migrations
AI Models
Security Framework
Memory Forensics
Operating System
Deployment
Version Control
// contact
Whether you're a recruiter, a supervisor evaluating my dissertation, a collaborator on security tools, or just curious about the work — I'm open to conversations.
// for visitors